[JSR308] updates to the Java Language Specification and other things to do

[Eugene Kuleshov]

  That is what I meant. So, Neal, do you think we should do the same, or 
there is something else need to be done?

  regards,
  Eugene


Neal Gafter wrote:
> jsr175 was delivered as a modified JLS and a compiler that implemented 
> it. The JLS itself was part of jsr175's completed product. The list of 
> sections was in addition to that to help the casual reader understand 
> what had changed.
>
> On May 17, 2007 4:31 PM, Eugene Kuleshov <eu at javatx.org 
> <mailto:eu at javatx.org>> wrote:
>
>
>      I heard some comments that JSR-308 isn't ready to be considered for
>     inclusion into the Java 7 at its current state and that there are
>     things
>     that it won't be ready in time to be included into Java 7. So, I
>     think
>     it should be a good idea to collect todo items that will be
>     required in
>     order this JSR to be considered for inclusion into Java 7.
>
>      Leaving aside the obvious general agreement on the language
>     syntax and
>     all other technical details (including bytecode generation and maybe
>     annotations on statements) what are the other things we need to
>     complete?
>
>      I've looked at the published JSR175 document and it is fairly short.
>     For the most part it just refer to the sections changes in the
>     JLS. So,
>     we will need to identify JLS sections that will need to be changed for
>     JSR308. Here is the old list: 7.4.1  8.1.1  8.3.1  8.4.1  8.4.3
>      8.5.1
>     8.8.3  8.9  9.1  9.3  9.4  9.6  9.7  13.5.7  14.4.1  15.1  18
>
>      regards,
>      Eugene
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     JSR308 mailing list
>     JSR308 at lists.csail.mit.edu <mailto:JSR308 at lists.csail.mit.edu>
>     https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsr308
>
>