[JSR308] Postfix syntax for type annotations

Eugene Kuleshov eu at javatx.org
Thu Mar 22 20:47:36 EDT 2007

Neal Gafter wrote:
> One issue is that I haven't seen type annotations on any shortlist for 
> JDK7, but have we aborted the JSR? If we're continuing with our work, 
> I'd really like to see something a bit more formal than the current 
> "spec".
  Neal, can you please elaborate what kind of formality you expecting to 
see? I am also curious how work from this JSR will be incorporated with 
other compiler extensions Sun compiler/jvm team is working on.

  BTW, slightly unrelated question, have you made any progress on 
compiler extension to support closures proposal?



More information about the JSR308 mailing list