[JSR308] Postfix syntax for type annotations

Neal Gafter gafter at google.com
Thu Mar 22 18:11:41 EDT 2007

On 2/25/07, Neal Gafter <gafter at google.com> wrote:
> In order to clarify the ambiguity issue, can you please include in the
> specification the proposed grammar changes? Then we can apply the usual
> grammar analysis techniques to see if there is an ambiguity or not.

This list has been silent for a few weeks. What's the status? One issue is
that I haven't seen type annotations on any shortlist for JDK7, but have we
aborted the JSR? If we're continuing with our work, I'd really like to see
something a bit more formal than the current "spec".

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.csail.mit.edu/pipermail/jsr308/attachments/20070322/382246eb/attachment.htm

More information about the JSR308 mailing list