[Jsr308-statements] Prototype of loop annotation compiler

[Trevor Harmon]

On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Eugene Kuleshov wrote:

>  On a side note, I think that such annotations should be written as  
> code attributes, especially because they have references to the  
> offset.

I suppose that would be better. Are the type annotations also  
attached to the code? I looked again at section 4 of the JSR-308  
proposal, but it wasn't clear about that.

Trevor