[Checkers] Number of checkers

[Matt Papi]

Sure, I can definitely do this.

- Matt

On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Michael Ernst <mernst at csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> I would like to say, throughout the paper, that we have 5 checkers.  Saying
>  that we have 4+1 feels more clumsy, and I don't think claiming 5 is
>  inaccurate.  I don't want to make this change while Matt is editing section
>  3.  Matt, could you make the change throughout the paper?  (Search for
>  "four" and "4".)
>
>                      Thanks,
>
>                     -Mike
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  checkers mailing list
>  checkers at lists.csail.mit.edu
>  https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/checkers
>