[JSR308] Others possible syntaxes for type annotations
mernst at csail.mit.edu
Fri May 18 14:42:04 EDT 2007
> I have in mind a uniform and unambiguous annotation syntax for types
> (essentially a single production), statements (ditto), and declarations
You have been saying this all year, but you haven't yet provided a
description of your proposed syntax.
Can you please provide a description of the syntax, even before you have an
implementation ready? That would be more productive than repeated claims
about a result that should be easy to communicate -- the claims without the
result slow down the group's progress rather than moving it forward.
More information about the JSR308