[JSR308] Others possible syntaxes for type annotations

[Michael Ernst]

Neal-

> I have in mind a uniform and unambiguous annotation syntax for types
> (essentially a single production), statements (ditto), and declarations

You have been saying this all year, but you haven't yet provided a
description of your proposed syntax.

Can you please provide a description of the syntax, even before you have an
implementation ready?  That would be more productive than repeated claims
about a result that should be easy to communicate -- the claims without the
result slow down the group's progress rather than moving it forward.

Thanks!

                    -Mike