[JSR308] Any progress on a more formal spec?

[Neal Gafter]

On 3/22/07, Neal Gafter <gafter at google.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/22/07, Eugene Kuleshov <eu at javatx.org> wrote:
> >
> > Neal Gafter wrote:
> > > One issue is that I haven't seen type annotations on any shortlist for
> > > JDK7, but have we aborted the JSR? If we're continuing with our work,
> > > I'd really like to see something a bit more formal than the current
> > > "spec".
> >   Neal, can you please elaborate what kind of formality you expecting to
> > see? I am also curious how work from this JSR will be incorporated with
> > other compiler extensions Sun compiler/jvm team is working on.
>
>
> A BNF for syntactic changes is the main thing I was thinking about.  The
> next thing would be a specification of the API changes for accessing the
> annotations.
>

Have we ended the work on this JSR, or has the work moved onto another list?
The silence is deafening.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.csail.mit.edu/pipermail/jsr308/attachments/20070327/10a15acc/attachment.html