[JSR308] Any progress on a more formal spec?
gafter at google.com
Tue Mar 27 22:46:18 EDT 2007
On 3/22/07, Neal Gafter <gafter at google.com> wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Eugene Kuleshov <eu at javatx.org> wrote:
> > Neal Gafter wrote:
> > > One issue is that I haven't seen type annotations on any shortlist for
> > > JDK7, but have we aborted the JSR? If we're continuing with our work,
> > > I'd really like to see something a bit more formal than the current
> > > "spec".
> > Neal, can you please elaborate what kind of formality you expecting to
> > see? I am also curious how work from this JSR will be incorporated with
> > other compiler extensions Sun compiler/jvm team is working on.
> A BNF for syntactic changes is the main thing I was thinking about. The
> next thing would be a specification of the API changes for accessing the
Have we ended the work on this JSR, or has the work moved onto another list?
The silence is deafening.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the JSR308