[JSR308] Resolution of optimization issue

[Trevor Harmon]

On Jun 4, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Michael Ernst wrote:

> Three implementation
>   strategies are for the compiler to not perform the optimization  
> when the
>   annotations differ, to create a single expression with both of the
>   annotations, or to create an unannotated expression and copy its  
> value
>   into two variables with differently-annotated types.

I think the text addresses the problem correctly, but I couldn't  
quite understand the last sentence. Maybe I'm just having trouble  
parsing it; should there be a colon between "are" and "for"?

Trevor