[JSR308] Postfix notation for type annotations

[Neal Gafter]

On 2/25/07, Michael Ernst <mernst at csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> A postfix syntax for type annotations was brought up three times on the
> mailing list, and once more when I asked for comments.  Hearing no support
> for it, I have moved it to the "Resolved issues" of the JSR 308 webpage:


Do I understand you to be saying that your sense of the group is that it is
preferred to have the current spec's ~15 separate syntactic solutions (to
the contexts where types appear in the grammar) than a single solution for
all of them?  I didn't read the discussions this way.  At best I would have
read that most people didn't seem to care.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.csail.mit.edu/pipermail/jsr308/attachments/20070225/3bbf60e8/attachment.html