[Checkers] AnnotatedTypeMirror is not sufficiently unique
Artemus Harper
subanark at gmail.com
Fri Oct 3 01:20:44 EDT 2008
>
> For example there is no way to determine the difference between the return
>> types of methods that have the same type and same annotations. This causes
>> me a problem since I want to be able to retrieve additional information on
>> an AnnotatedType (in particular the receiver of the method, if any, that is
>> scope with the deceleration)
>>
> You can AnnotatedExecutableType.getElement() to differentiate between them.
> You can only use this with method executable type rather than the return or
> the receiver type.
>
> - Mahmood
>
>
For return values and receivers the getElement() will return null as there
is no Element for this (as noted in #2). ExecutableElement has a
getReturnType() method which provides a TypeMirror, but as far as I know
there is no Element representation for a return type.
If I can get a unique AnnotatedTypeMirror for a Tree or Element, then I can
create an identity map that maps those to the method receiver in the
annotateImplicit methods. This allows me to latter look them up in cases
where I only have the AnnotatedTypeMirror (as with the isSubtype method in
the BaseTypeChecker).
Since AnnotatedTypeFactory.getAnnotatedType caches results and provides
copies of the cache when called I don't have the opturnity to map this value
without overriding the getAnnotatedType method.
The reason I assumed that AnnotatedTypeMirror was to be unique for each
Element is that they have a getElement method. I'm at a loss why there is
this method at all if the AnnotatedTypeMirror is just to wrap the TypeMirror
and disregard the element property which may be different for "equal" types.
--
Artemus Harper
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/private/checkers/attachments/20081002/fc350254/attachment.htm
More information about the checkers
mailing list