[Checkers] checking for SupportedAnnotationTypes

[Mahmood Ali]

Hi Matt,

Oh! I didn't realize that.  That was un-intentional.

- Mahmood

On May 30, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Matt Papi wrote:

> Mahmood,
>
> It looks like r2593 does exactly what (part of) r2584 does -- raising
> an error about the presence of @SupportedAnnotationTypes -- though in
> a different place. Was this intentional?
>
> (Either way, I think SourceChecker is a better place for the check,
> since that's where getSupportedAnnotationTypes() is overridden to
> return "*".)
>
> - Matt