[Checkers] checking for SupportedAnnotationTypes
mahmood at MIT.EDU
Fri May 30 09:22:25 EDT 2008
Oh! I didn't realize that. That was un-intentional.
On May 30, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Matt Papi wrote:
> It looks like r2593 does exactly what (part of) r2584 does -- raising
> an error about the presence of @SupportedAnnotationTypes -- though in
> a different place. Was this intentional?
> (Either way, I think SourceChecker is a better place for the check,
> since that's where getSupportedAnnotationTypes() is overridden to
> return "*".)
> - Matt
More information about the checkers