[JSR308] Postfix notation for type annotations

[Ted Neward]

Or that people were tired of arguing.

 

I’ll go on record as supporting the simpler solution.

 

Ted Neward

Java, .NET, XML Services

Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing

HYPERLINK "http://www.tedneward.com"http://www.tedneward.com

 

   _____  

From: jsr308-bounces at lists.csail.mit.edu
[mailto:jsr308-bounces at lists.csail.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Neal Gafter
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:55 PM
To: Michael Ernst
Cc: JSR 308 (Annotations) mailing list
Subject: Re: [JSR308] Postfix notation for type annotations

 

On 2/25/07, Michael Ernst <HYPERLINK "mailto:mernst at csail.mit.edu"
\nmernst at csail.mit.edu> wrote:

A postfix syntax for type annotations was brought up three times on the
mailing list, and once more when I asked for comments.  Hearing no support
for it, I have moved it to the "Resolved issues" of the JSR 308 webpage: 


Do I understand you to be saying that your sense of the group is that it is
preferred to have the current spec's ~15 separate syntactic solutions (to
the contexts where types appear in the grammar) than a single solution for
all of them?  I didn't read the discussions this way.  At best I would have
read that most people didn't seem to care.

 

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/699 - Release Date: 2/23/2007
1:26 PM


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/699 - Release Date: 2/23/2007
1:26 PM
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.csail.mit.edu/pipermail/jsr308/attachments/20070225/c8df0055/attachment.html